American Airlines Flight 77: Attack on the the Pentagon
From Xiandos Info
The Attack on the the Pentagon is a myth that American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon at 550 miles pr. hour on September 11, 2001.
The trick: Tell people a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon enough times, and they will eventually believe one did.
Contents |
The Official Story
American Airlines Flight 77 was a morning flight that routinely flew from Washington Dulles International Airport in Fairfax County and Loudoun County, Virginia, near Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California (IAD-LAX). On September 11, 2001, the Boeing 757-223, N644AA, was hijacked as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The hijackers were reported to have been Khalid al-Mihdhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, and the suicide pilot Hani Hanjour.
The official story is that Flight 77 crashed into the western side of The Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia, just south of Washington, DC at 9:37 AM EDT, killing all of its 58 passengers (including the hijackers). It is also claimed that the crash and subsequent fire penetrated three outer ring sections of the western side. The outermost ring section was largely destroyed, and a large section collapsed. 125 people in the Pentagon died from the attack.
This image pretty much sums up the "official" story:
The Pentagon, September 11th 2001: Picture by Picture
- There was absolutely no sign of a Boeing 757 directly the object that hit the Pentagon hit it
- "From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." --Jamie McIntyre says
- The fire truck is moved to block the point of impact from view
- Pengaton after the wall had collapsed.
- The wall collapsed about 45 minutes after the object hit the Pentagon.
September 15, 2001
Let's make it look more like something actually crashed:
(Photo by FEMA)
From A Webreader in sweden: Can I ask a simple question - What ?! sort of buiness was handled in that part of the building that was "Slamed"?
Media Hogwash and fabricated evidence
- "It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards."
- While reviewing my 8 hours of tapes I made some discoveries.
- "At 11:07am (eastern time) CNN's Aaron Brown talks with CNN's Alan Dodds Frank who is in lower Manhattan. Frank apparently reports that there was another explosion or building collapse 2 or 3 minutes ago. He says it happened at about 10:45 (his time is off by about 20 minutes). He says it fell 15 minutes after the collapse of the North Tower (10:28) and a firefighter estimated 50 stories fell. When viewing this clip notice that Brown doesn't ask which building fell; why it fell; or, were there people in or around the building. When Frank is done with his report Brown casually moves on and changes the subject! Shortly after this conversation the clock underneath the CNN logo disappears and is never displayed again."
- Popularmechanics: 9/11: Debunking The Myths
- Some Left academics and peace movement theorists still vehemently support the official story
- "Whoever the so-called experts are, Popular Mechanics is certainly an ally of the US government, to say the least. Its new owner has lifelong connections with the CIA, its editors were sacked a few months before this lavishly financed relaunch issue."]
- Popular Mechanics' Deceptive Smear Against 9/11 Truth
- Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man
- "It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack."
- Some Left academics and peace movement theorists still vehemently support the official story
For your consideration
Is there ANY evidence a boeing hit the Pentagon on 9/11? Was it a 747 or a 737. The news Reports both. Which one was it?
Best Pentagon 911 Music Video Award Goes to "Pentagon Strike"
- Get the facts in a cool music video! Check out Pentagon Strike
The attack was orchestrated by the US government and, according to Stanley Hilton, ordred by George Bush.
- "Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East."
- This series of comments was begun in September of 2002 when many readers of our website deluged us with emails asking what we thought about the evidence that a Boeing 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon. Up to that moment in time, there was no question in our minds that the events of 9-11 happened exactly as described by the media and the Bush Administration. Of course, we had certain ideas as to WHO was behind those events, but the important point is that we did not question the "facts on the ground" of the event.
- "If you begin to question whether a Boeing really did crash on the Pentagon then, no doubt, you'll be wondering what happened to the aircraft that disappeared. You will probably ask yourself why the US government even told you this story in the first place and you'll start asking yourself lots of other questions besides. Don't worry! This is perfectly normal!"
- "It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."
- The Hunt For Flight 77
- We let to you judge on part. Here, gathered on the same site, the photographs of the attack against the Pentagon. You can consult them in several formats and download them in high definition. The initial legend, the name of the photographer and his service and the Web page where the image was published are systematically indicated. The diversion of a plane makes it possible to justify the thesis of the external enemy. But if the cause of the explosion is not a plane fallen from the sky, there probably existed of internal complicities. The enemy of the American democracy could be interior well.]
- The Hunt For Flight 77
- "So we see, from just a few pictures and a few videos, that the Pentagon attack didn't involve a 757, nor did it involve Flight 11. It's really the trajectory issue, and the lack of a Boeing 757 that are among the top proofs that the Pentagon story is a complete and total fraud."]
- "The second strongest piece of evidence I would say is the crash at the Pentagon. The physical evidence contradicts so violently the official account, that the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757 Flight 77, that is. The physical evidence, photographs, and eyewitness testimony say that the Pentagon was hit by something that caused a hole no larger than 18 feet in diameter. The story the Pentagon put out, and was published by the Washington Post, was that the hole in the Pentagon was five stories high and 200 feet wide. If you look at the photographs taken by Tom Horan of the Associated Press - that's just not the size of the hole."
In the news
- 2006-05-16: -- Pentagon releases new film of Sept. 11 plane attack
- The new videos are not significantly different than previous still photos released from a security camera in the area. After viewing the tapes, Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano commented: "This is going to cause more conspiracy theories."